Finance.Foundation
finance.foundation / Markets / XLON vs XSHG
Venue comparison · seed-0.7 · marketcap-1 · 2026-08-30

London Stock Exchange (XLON) vs Shanghai Stock Exchange (XSHG)

London Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange compared by ISO 10383 identity, operator, trading session, settlement cycle and covered listings.

FieldLondon Stock ExchangeShanghai Stock Exchange
Operating MICXLONXSHG
Segment MICs41
CountryUnited KingdomChina
OperatorLondon Stock Exchange Group (LSEG)Shanghai Stock Exchange
Operator LEI213800D1EI4B9WTWWD28300300LRJ5FEZ23N8725
Trading currencyGBPCNY
TimezoneEurope/LondonAsia/Shanghai
Session (local)08:00–16:3009:30–15:00
Lunch breaknone11:30-13:00
SettlementT+2T+1
Covered listings71
Covered listed value ≈$1.5tn$241.3bn
BenchmarksFTSE 100, FTSE 250, FTSE All-Share, FTSE AIM All-ShareSSE Composite Index, SSE 50, STAR 50, CSI 300 (multi-venue)

London Stock Exchange

Primary UK equity venue; LSEG is also a major market-data provider (Refinitiv).

Venue profile →

Shanghai Stock Exchange

Largest mainland-China exchange; access for foreign investors via Stock Connect.

Venue profile →

"Covered listings" counts companies in the Finance Foundation dataset, not the venue's full listing count, and "covered listed value" sums the computed market caps of those companies (close 2026-08-28) — a sum of estimates over a hand-picked set, not the venue's listed market capitalisation. The comparison is of our covered set, stated plainly. MIC data from the ISO 10383 registry, operator LEIs from GLEIF, session times compiled from each venue's published calendar. seed-0.7 · marketcap-1 · 2026-08-30 · sources.