finance.foundation / Markets / XPAR vs XKRX
Venue comparison · seed-0.7 · marketcap-1 · 2026-08-30
Euronext (XPAR) vs Korea Exchange (XKRX)
Euronext and Korea Exchange compared by ISO 10383 identity, operator, trading session, settlement cycle and covered listings.
| Field | Euronext | Korea Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| Operating MIC | XPAR | XKRX |
| Segment MICs | 4 | 3 |
| Country | France | South Korea |
| Operator | Euronext N.V. | KRX |
| Operator LEI | 969500HMVSZ0TCV65D58 | 549300TJ3RRV6Q1UEW14 |
| Trading currency | EUR | KRW |
| Timezone | Europe/Paris | Asia/Seoul |
| Session (local) | 09:00–17:30 | 09:00–15:30 |
| Lunch break | none | none |
| Settlement | T+2 | T+2 |
| Covered listings | 9 | 2 |
| Covered listed value ≈ | $2.1tn | $2.1tn |
| Benchmarks | CAC 40, CAC Next 20, SBF 120, Euronext 100 | KOSPI, KOSPI 200, KOSDAQ Composite |
Euronext
Pan-European exchange spanning Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Lisbon, Dublin, Milan and Oslo.
"Covered listings" counts companies in the Finance Foundation dataset, not the venue's full listing count, and "covered listed value" sums the computed market caps of those companies (close 2026-08-28) — a sum of estimates over a hand-picked set, not the venue's listed market capitalisation. The comparison is of our covered set, stated plainly. MIC data from the ISO 10383 registry, operator LEIs from GLEIF, session times compiled from each venue's published calendar. seed-0.7 · marketcap-1 · 2026-08-30 · sources.